Melbourne investment property: the case after land tax changes
Victoria's land tax reform has changed the investment equation for Melbourne property.
3 min read
Victoria's land tax reform has changed the investment equation for Melbourne property.
3 min read
Melbourne's investment property market has absorbed the full impact of the Victorian government's land tax changes over 2024-2025, and the investment landscape that has emerged is measurably different from what preceded the reforms: landlord sell-offs in some sub-markets, tighter rental markets as some investment supply has been removed from the rental pool, and an investor assessment process that must now explicitly model land tax as a material holding cost rather than a minor portfolio footnote.
The Victorian land tax applies to land with site values above $300,000 at a rate structure that begins at 0.2 per cent and scales to 2.55 per cent for the highest-value landholdings. For a Melbourne investment property on land with a site value of $600,000 — typical for an established house in the middle ring — the annual land tax is approximately $1,000-$2,000 depending on the investor's aggregate Victorian landholding. For investors with multiple Victorian properties, the aggregate site value determines the rate applied to the entire portfolio, meaning that each additional property adds both its own land value to the taxable aggregate and potentially increases the effective rate applied to the whole portfolio.
The holding cost impact of Victorian land tax on Melbourne investment property net yields is meaningful but manageable for investors who have modelled it correctly from the outset. A gross yield of 4.5 per cent on a $900,000 Melbourne investment property delivers $40,500 per year in rental income. After land tax of approximately $2,000, property management at 8 per cent ($3,240), insurance ($1,200), rates ($1,800), and interest on the investment loan (if leveraged), the net cash position depends significantly on the loan level. Investors who have modelled these costs explicitly and accepted the net cash position as their starting point for an investment that they expect to deliver capital growth make better decisions than those who relied on gross yield as the primary investment assessment metric.
The apartment sub-market in Melbourne has been particularly affected by the combination of land tax, cladding remediation costs impacting some strata complexes, and the large supply of new apartments built during the 2015-2020 construction cycle. Apartment investors who are assessing Melbourne should conduct thorough due diligence on the strata plan's financial health, the building's cladding compliance status, and the specific sub-market's supply and demand dynamics before committing capital.
This article was compiled by AI from the sources linked above and screened before publishing. See our editorial standards.
About this article
Published by The Daily Melbourne
Daily brief
Free, in your inbox before 7am. Weekdays.
You might also like

Finance

Finance

Finance

Finance
Free daily briefing