Melbourne's inner suburbs are about to feel the ripple effects of a major housing policy shift. The City of Melbourne has quietly tightened planning rules around short-term rental accommodations, capping the number of days property owners can list residential homes on platforms like Airbnb. For Collingwood, Fitzroy, and Brunswick—where tourism and student populations have driven explosive growth in holiday lets—the implications are profound.
The new restrictions limit short-term rentals to 120 days per year in most residential zones, a move designed to free up long-term rental stock in a city where median rents have climbed 18 per cent over the past two years. For a two-bedroom apartment in Collingwood, that now translates to roughly $2,100 monthly—pushing out younger workers, service industry staff, and families on modest incomes.
But here's where it gets complicated for residents. The policy creates winners and losers. Property investors who've banked on short-term rental income face a sudden revenue cliff. One Fitzroy landlord could see annual income drop by $15,000 or more. Conversely, long-term renters may finally find breathing room: more properties cycling back into the 12-month rental market could stabilise prices and offer stability to those tired of bidding wars.
Community groups are divided. The Brunswick Housing Coalition welcomes the move, arguing that holiday rentals have hollowed out neighbourhood character—empty apartments mean fewer permanent residents supporting local shops, schools, and community centres. Yet small property owners who've relied on short-term income to service mortgages are quietly panicking, unsure whether they'll convert to long-term leasing or sell.
The City of Melbourne argues this is urban planning necessity. Inner suburbs have seen their residential populations plateau as short-term rentals proliferate; planning data suggests up to 15 per cent of rental housing in parts of Collingwood operates as permanent holiday lets. When residents can't afford to live in their own neighbourhoods, social cohesion frays.
What's missing from the policy debate is enforcement capacity and support for the transition. How will councils monitor compliance? Will property owners downsizing into long-term rentals receive guidance? Will investors have transition periods?
The answers will determine whether this policy becomes a genuine circuit-breaker for Melbourne's housing crisis or simply shuffles the problem elsewhere. For residents in affected suburbs, watching these decisions play out carries real weight: their ability to afford staying put depends on it.
This article was compiled by AI from the sources linked above and screened before publishing. See our editorial standards.
About this article
Published by The Daily Melbourne
This article was produced by the The Daily Melbourne editorial desk and covers news in Melbourne. See our editorial standards for how we use AI.
See something wrong? Suggest a correction.
Daily brief
Enjoyed this? Wake up to Melbourne news every morning.
Free, in your inbox before 7am. Weekdays.